Ruff v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:17-cv-00413. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190508f25
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: May 07, 2019
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 16), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 15), AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 16) filed by Plaintiff Jason F. Ruff ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 15). Magistrate Judge Newman recommended that the Commission
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 16), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 15), AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 16) filed by Plaintiff Jason F. Ruff ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 15). Magistrate Judge Newman recommended that the Commissione..
More
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 16), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 15), AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 16) filed by Plaintiff Jason F. Ruff ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 15). Magistrate Judge Newman recommended that the Commissioner's non-disability finding be affirmed. Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report. (Doc. 16.) The Commissioner has not responded to Plaintiff's Objections, but the Court deems no response necessary based upon its review of the record. This matter is therefore ripe for review.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 16) to the Report are not well-taken and are OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report (Doc. 15) and rules as follows:
1. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record and is AFFIRMED; and
2. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
