Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WROLEN v. U.S., 12-cv-780-JPG. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20120724876 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on petitioner Richard D. Wrolen's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. 1). It has come to the Court's attention that this is not Wrolen's first 2255 motion. He filed his first motion in January 2009, and the Court denied it. See No. 09-cv-51-JPG. In order for the Court to consider a successive petition, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals must certify
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on petitioner Richard D. Wrolen's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1). It has come to the Court's attention that this is not Wrolen's first § 2255 motion. He filed his first motion in January 2009, and the Court denied it. See No. 09-cv-51-JPG. In order for the Court to consider a successive petition, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals must certify the successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Nunez v. United States, 96 F.3d 990, 991 (7th Cir. 1996). It has not done so. Therefore, the Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the pending § 2255 motion. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES this action for lack of jurisdiction and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer