Milano v. TD Bank USA, N.A., 3:18-cv-598-J-34JBT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180706815
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 JOEL B. TOOMEY , Magistrate Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties' Joint Oral Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice ("Motion") (Doc. 23). On June 12, 2018, the undersigned held a preliminary pretrial conference and motion hearing in this case and in Milano v. TD Bank US Holding Company, Case No. 3:18-cv-416-J-34JBT. At the hearing, the parties jointly moved to dismiss the instant case with prejudice. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED t
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 JOEL B. TOOMEY , Magistrate Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties' Joint Oral Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice ("Motion") (Doc. 23). On June 12, 2018, the undersigned held a preliminary pretrial conference and motion hearing in this case and in Milano v. TD Bank US Holding Company, Case No. 3:18-cv-416-J-34JBT. At the hearing, the parties jointly moved to dismiss the instant case with prejudice. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED th..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1
JOEL B. TOOMEY, Magistrate Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties' Joint Oral Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice ("Motion") (Doc. 23). On June 12, 2018, the undersigned held a preliminary pretrial conference and motion hearing in this case and in Milano v. TD Bank US Holding Company, Case No. 3:18-cv-416-J-34JBT. At the hearing, the parties jointly moved to dismiss the instant case with prejudice. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that:
1. The case be DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. The Clerk of Court be directed to terminate any pending motions and close the file.
FootNotes
1. "Within 14 days after being served with a copy of [this Report and Recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). "A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy." Id. A party's failure to serve and file specific objections to the proposed findings and recommendations alters the scope of review by the District Judge and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, including waiver of the right to challenge anything to which no specific objection was made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 11th Cir. R. 3-1; Local Rule 6.02.
Source: Leagle
