Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Danner v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-245-MOC. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180410a35 Visitors: 30
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on the parties' Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). As this court has the power under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) "to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the decision of the Commissioner, with or without remanding the case for a rehearing," and since each party consents to reversal and reman
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on the parties' Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As this court has the power under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) "to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the decision of the Commissioner, with or without remanding the case for a rehearing," and since each party consents to reversal and remand in this matter, the court will grant this motion. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Having thus considered the parties' motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties' Consent Motion for Reversal and Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (#16) is GRANTED. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer