Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CURRY v. DAY, CV 114-173. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20151210b02 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DISMISSES without prejudice the John Doe Defendants, as well as all claims raised against them, based on the failure to timely effect service. SO ORDERED.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DISMISSES without prejudice the John Doe Defendants, as well as all claims raised against them, based on the failure to timely effect service.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer