DZ BANK AG DEUTSCHE ZENTRAL-GENOSSENSCHAFTSBANK v. McCRANIE, 3:10-cv-222-J-MCR. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20130614b72
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2013
Summary: ORDER MONTE C RICHARDSON, Magisrate Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Doc. 88) filed June 13, 2013. Attorney Alex Darcy seeks admission pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff in this matter. The instant Motion asserts that Mr. Darcy is a member in good standing of the Illinois Bar. However, Mr. Darcy has not provided proof, nor have he averred that he is a "member in good standing of the bar of any District Court of the United States, ou
Summary: ORDER MONTE C RICHARDSON, Magisrate Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Doc. 88) filed June 13, 2013. Attorney Alex Darcy seeks admission pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff in this matter. The instant Motion asserts that Mr. Darcy is a member in good standing of the Illinois Bar. However, Mr. Darcy has not provided proof, nor have he averred that he is a "member in good standing of the bar of any District Court of the United States, out..
More
ORDER
MONTE C RICHARDSON, Magisrate Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Doc. 88) filed June 13, 2013. Attorney Alex Darcy seeks admission pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff in this matter. The instant Motion asserts that Mr. Darcy is a member in good standing of the Illinois Bar. However, Mr. Darcy has not provided proof, nor have he averred that he is a "member in good standing of the bar of any District Court of the United States, outside the State of Florida," as is required by Local Rule 2.02(a). Furthermore, Plaintiff did not seek waiver of this requirement. As such, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Doc. 88) at this time.1
Accordingly, after due consideration, it is ORDERED:
Plaintiff's Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Doc. 88) is DENIED without prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The instant Motion also fails to certify compliance with the requirement of Local Rule 3.01(g).
Source: Leagle
