U.S. v. COOK, 1:11-CR-218-1-TWT. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120425d33
Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, Jr., District Judge. This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 184] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendants' Motions to Suppress [Doc. 93, 104, 115 & 116]. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Government's applications set forth adequate grounds for issuance of the wiretap orders. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defe
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, Jr., District Judge. This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 184] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendants' Motions to Suppress [Doc. 93, 104, 115 & 116]. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Government's applications set forth adequate grounds for issuance of the wiretap orders. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defen..
More
ORDER
THOMAS W. THRASH, Jr., District Judge.
This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 184] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendants' Motions to Suppress [Doc. 93, 104, 115 & 116]. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Government's applications set forth adequate grounds for issuance of the wiretap orders. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendants' Motions to Suppress [Doc. 93, 104, 115 & 116] are DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle