Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lampley v. Franklin County, 3:16-cv-00117-JPG-DGW. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20181003d06 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on a number of papers from both parties. First, the plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss all of the individual defendants from this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 113.) The defendants have filed a response consenting to the motion. (ECF No. 114.) The Court will accordingly GRANT the motion and DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE all of the individual defendants from this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civi
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on a number of papers from both parties. First, the plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss all of the individual defendants from this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 113.) The defendants have filed a response consenting to the motion. (ECF No. 114.) The Court will accordingly GRANT the motion and DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE all of the individual defendants from this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2): Sheriff Donald Jones, Chet Lee Shaffer, Gerald Dorris, Rachel Heise, Tiffanie Young Harris, Kayelynne Sue Mason, Edith Marie Johnson, Phillip Jackson, Annabelle Shukites, Dr. Adeyemi Fatoki and David R. Veldman. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate these parties as defendants in this matter.

Defendants Franklin County, Illinois, Correctional Healthcare, LTD, and Correctional Healthcare Physicians II, PC remain. Franklin County has filed a paper indicating that the claims against these three remaining parties have settled and no further claims remain for adjudication. (ECF No. 115.) But since Franklin County was the only party to sign that paper, the Court cannot yet close this case. If the remaining parties want the Court to close this case, then the parties should file a stipulated dismissal signed by all parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer