U.S. v. RAINES, 1:04-CR-28-SPM/GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120724803
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the Court upon "Motion Challenging the Factual Inaccuracies of Presentence Investigation Report Pursuant 32(c)(3)(D) of Federal Rules Criminal Procedure in Which Court Lost Subject Matter Jurisdiction" (doc. 148). Although it is difficult to understand Defendant's argument or the requested relief, he seems to be challenging the findings in the Presentence Investigation Report. "Within 14 days after receiving the presentence
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the Court upon "Motion Challenging the Factual Inaccuracies of Presentence Investigation Report Pursuant 32(c)(3)(D) of Federal Rules Criminal Procedure in Which Court Lost Subject Matter Jurisdiction" (doc. 148). Although it is difficult to understand Defendant's argument or the requested relief, he seems to be challenging the findings in the Presentence Investigation Report. "Within 14 days after receiving the presentence r..
More
ORDER
STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon "Motion Challenging the Factual Inaccuracies of Presentence Investigation Report Pursuant 32(c)(3)(D) of Federal Rules Criminal Procedure in Which Court Lost Subject Matter Jurisdiction" (doc. 148). Although it is difficult to understand Defendant's argument or the requested relief, he seems to be challenging the findings in the Presentence Investigation Report. "Within 14 days after receiving the presentence report the parties must state in writing any objections, including objections to material information, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the report." Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f). Accordingly, any objections Defendant had regarding the report should have been raised at that time and any issues not raised during that 14 day period of time are waived. Therefore, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that Defendant's motion (doc. 148) is denied.
Source: Leagle
