Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Reyes, 2:12-cr-187 TLN. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150416965 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCE AND SCHEDULE FOR DICLOSURE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, defendant MANOLO REYES through herundersigned counsel Dwight Samuel that the scheduled sentencing date and schedule for dates be changed to the following: Judgement and sentencing date be changed from May 14, 2015 to July 9, 2015, at 9:30 a.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCE AND SCHEDULE FOR DICLOSURE

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, defendant MANOLO REYES through herundersigned counsel Dwight Samuel that the scheduled sentencing date and schedule for dates be changed to the following:

Judgement and sentencing date be changed from May 14, 2015 to July 9, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.

The following schedule for disclosure of pre-sentence report and for filing of objections to the presentence report it is agreed to be as follows:

Reply or statement of non-opposition June 25, 2015 Motion for correction of Pre-Sentence report filed June 18, 2015 Pre-Sentence report filed June 11, 2015 Counsel's written objections to the pre-sentence to probation June 4, 2015 Proposed Pre-sentence report disclosed to counsel May 21, 2015

This stipulation is made because MANOLO REYES proposed presentence report is not yet completed at this date. In addition Mr. Samuel has a prepaid vacation scheduled. Defendant is aware of the delay and the reasons for such a delay and is in agreement.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation, vacate the present date for sentence of May 14, 2015 and adopt the above enumerated shedule for disclosure and response to the Pre-sentence report with sentencing reset to July 9, 2015.

/s/ Paul Hemesath ___________________________ Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Hemesath

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety and it is so order

Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

It is further ordered that the May 14, 2015 date for sentencing shall be continued to July 9, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer