U.S. v. Goldsmith, 3:06cr101/LAC/EMT (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190311936
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2019 (ECF No. 181). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that it should be ad
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2019 (ECF No. 181). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that it should be ado..
More
ORDER
LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2019 (ECF No. 181). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that it should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The Motion to Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 175) is DENIED.
2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
