BULLARD v. HAYNES, CV211-052. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120307976
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief District Judge. After an independent and do novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections and a Response thereto have been filed. In his Objections, Petitioner Frederick Bullard ("Bullard") alleges that he was erroneously classified as a career offender and his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum. However, Bullard's allegation is misplaced, as the maximum sentence Bullard
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief District Judge. After an independent and do novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections and a Response thereto have been filed. In his Objections, Petitioner Frederick Bullard ("Bullard") alleges that he was erroneously classified as a career offender and his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum. However, Bullard's allegation is misplaced, as the maximum sentence Bullard f..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief District Judge.
After an independent and do novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections and a Response thereto have been filed. In his Objections, Petitioner Frederick Bullard ("Bullard") alleges that he was erroneously classified as a career offender and his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum. However, Bullard's allegation is misplaced, as the maximum sentence Bullard faced for his conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), pursuant to the applicable penalty statute, was life imprisonment. Bullard's 40 year sentence does not exceed the maximum sentence authorized by statute. Thus, his claim is foreclosed by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Gilbert v. United States, 640 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2011).
Bullard's Objections are overruled. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Bullard's petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
