Pohl v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 3:18-cv-00019. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190423718
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #13), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1.
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #13), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. T..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #13), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on April 3, 2019 (Doc. #13) is ADOPTED in full;
2. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Michael Pohl was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act;
3. This case is remanded to the Social Security Administration under sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations and this Decision and Entry; and
4. The case is terminated on the Court's docket.
Source: Leagle
