Hindes v. BOP Medical Staff, 14-cv-1272-JPG-DGW (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20181003f30
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision as to some matters and a jury having rendered a decision as to others, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Leslee Duncan (n/k/a Leslee Brooks) and Robert King and against plaintiff Richard Hindes on Hindes' Bivens claims for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of th
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision as to some matters and a jury having rendered a decision as to others, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Leslee Duncan (n/k/a Leslee Brooks) and Robert King and against plaintiff Richard Hindes on Hindes' Bivens claims for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the..
More
JUDGMENT
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision as to some matters and a jury having rendered a decision as to others,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Leslee Duncan (n/k/a Leslee Brooks) and Robert King and against plaintiff Richard Hindes on Hindes' Bivens claims for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Hinde's Bivens claim against defendant BOP Medical Staff for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment is dismissed with prejudice; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGES that the following claims are dismissed without prejudice:
• Hindes' Bivens claims against defendants Paul Harvey and Patrick Cunningham for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and
• Hindes' Federal Tort Claims Act claim against the United States of America for inadequate medical care.
Source: Leagle
