Glass v. Rockwell Collins, Inc., 9:17-2380-PMD-MGB. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20180511e21
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 10, 2018
Latest Update: May 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice as to plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and granted without prejudice as to her civil conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation claims. The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g)
Summary: ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice as to plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and granted without prejudice as to her civil conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation claims. The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g) a..
More
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice as to plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and granted without prejudice as to her civil conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation claims. The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE, and GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to plaintiff's civil conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation claims.
ORDERED, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
