ROBERTSON v. FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF LYNCHBURG, LLC, 12-1520. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120723087
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Lee Robertson appeals the district court's orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Flowers Banking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, No. 6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, Apr. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Lee Robertson appeals the district court's orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Flowers Banking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, No. 6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, Apr. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument b..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Lee Robertson appeals the district court's orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Flowers Banking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, No. 6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, Apr. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
