COPELAND v. MORALES, CV 310-061. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120127h63
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN, Jr., District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the tile, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. 1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 27) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process. SO
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN, Jr., District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the tile, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. 1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 27) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process. SO O..
More
ORDER
DUDLEY H. BOWEN, Jr., District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the tile, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 27) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff filed a response in which he states that he will not be filing objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. no. 46, p. 1.)
Source: Leagle