BC Power, Inc. v. Stuart C. Irby Company, 2:19-cv-803-FtM-38NPM. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20200116c25
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2020
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the file. Because this case involves questions of law or fact common to those Senior United States District Judge John E. Steele decided in Stuart C. Irby Company v. BC Power, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-211-29CM, the undersigned transfers this case to him, with his consent, for all further proceedings under Middle District of Florida Local Rule 1.04. ORDERED: The Clerk is DIRECTED
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the file. Because this case involves questions of law or fact common to those Senior United States District Judge John E. Steele decided in Stuart C. Irby Company v. BC Power, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-211-29CM, the undersigned transfers this case to him, with his consent, for all further proceedings under Middle District of Florida Local Rule 1.04. ORDERED: The Clerk is DIRECTED t..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the file. Because this case involves questions of law or fact common to those Senior United States District Judge John E. Steele decided in Stuart C. Irby Company v. BC Power, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-211-29CM, the undersigned transfers this case to him, with his consent, for all further proceedings under Middle District of Florida Local Rule 1.04.
ORDERED:
The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this case and all pending motions and deadlines to Senior United States District Judge John E. Steele.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink's availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order.
Source: Leagle
