K.W. v. ARMSTRONG, 1:12-cv-00022-BLW. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20120504f45
Visitors: 23
Filed: May 02, 2012
Latest Update: May 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. This Court has before it the parties' STIPULATION TO ALLOW SURREPLY RE: MOTION TO APPROVE DEFENDANTS' NOTICES. This Court has reviewed the record in this case and the parties' stipulation, and has determined that there is good cause for approving the parties' stipulation. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Stipulation (docket no. 55) is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that plaintiffs may file a sur-reply brief regarding the motion to approve def
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. This Court has before it the parties' STIPULATION TO ALLOW SURREPLY RE: MOTION TO APPROVE DEFENDANTS' NOTICES. This Court has reviewed the record in this case and the parties' stipulation, and has determined that there is good cause for approving the parties' stipulation. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Stipulation (docket no. 55) is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that plaintiffs may file a sur-reply brief regarding the motion to approve defe..
More
ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.
This Court has before it the parties' STIPULATION TO ALLOW SURREPLY RE: MOTION TO APPROVE DEFENDANTS' NOTICES. This Court has reviewed the record in this case and the parties' stipulation, and has determined that there is good cause for approving the parties' stipulation.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Stipulation (docket no. 55) is APPROVED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that plaintiffs may file a sur-reply brief regarding the motion to approve defendants' notices (docket no. 42) on or before May 21, 2012.
Source: Leagle
