Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cardinali v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:16-cv-2046-JAD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180928830 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [First Request] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, Non-Party Haines & Krieger, LLC ("H&K") and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby move jointly and request that this Court extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a reply in support of his motion for protective order. In support of the same, the parties state as follows: On July 10, 2018, Experian n
More

ORDER

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

[First Request]

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, Non-Party Haines & Krieger, LLC ("H&K") and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby move jointly and request that this Court extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a reply in support of his motion for protective order. In support of the same, the parties state as follows:

On July 10, 2018, Experian noticed the deposition of H&K, one of the law firms representing Plaintiff Louis Cardinali, for July 30, 2018.

On July 18, 2018, H&K moved to quash Experian's deposition subpoena on an emergency basis. ECF Dkt. 84, 85.

On July 18, 2018, the Court granted H&K's motion to vacate the then-pending deposition date, and issued an order setting briefing on H&K's motion in the ordinary course. ECF Dkt. 86 (minutes).

On August 1, 2018, Experian responded to the motion. ECF Dkt. 87. Replies are presently due on August 8, 2018.

Experian and H&K request that H&K be permitted an additional seven days to reply, until August 15, 2018. This additional time will permit H&K time to review and respond to the arguments set forth in the response. This is the first request for extension of the reply deadline, and is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

Although this motion is being filed by H&K and Experian, all other counsel of record in this case have been contacted and none oppose this stipulation.

It is so stipulated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer