McKenzie v. Staten, 6:17-cv-83. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200113a18
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 24). Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jane Doe, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to termi
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 24). Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jane Doe, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to termin..
More
ORDER
R. STAN BAKER, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 24). Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jane Doe, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate Defendant Jane Doe as a Defendant in this case, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis as to his claims against Defendant Jane Doe.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
