Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. KIRKSEY, 1:05cr33-MP-GRJ. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120504f17 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 02, 2012
Latest Update: May 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 8, 2012. (Doc. 383). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objectio
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 8, 2012. (Doc. 383). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's amended motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 341) is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot and the Clerk is directed to close the file

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer