Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Garcia v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 2:17-cv-03123-JAD-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180319883 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] ECF No. 14 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Oscar L. Garcia ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax") have agreed and stipulated to the following: 1. On December 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1]. 2. On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff file and Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 4]. 3. On February 2
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

[FIRST REQUEST] ECF No. 14

Plaintiff Oscar L. Garcia ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax") have agreed and stipulated to the following:

1. On December 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

2. On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff file and Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 4].

3. On February 28, 2018 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 9].

4. Plaintiff's Response is due March 14, 2018.

5. Plaintiff and Equifax have agreed to extend Plaintiff's response seven days in order to allow the parties to work toward a stipulation to file a second amended complaint addressing Equifax's pending motion to dismiss. As a result, both Plaintiff and Equifax hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to Equifax's Motion to Dismiss Complaint until March 21, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer