Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CAMPOS, 4:13-CR-85-BLW. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Idaho Number: infdco20130621991 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2013
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge. The Court has before it a motion to continue trial filed by defendant Noe Gonzalez. The defendant requests additional time so that counsel will have adequate time to prepare for trial. Defense counsel requests a continuance until October of 2013, and the Court finds that a continuance until October 21, 2013, would be reasonable given the complexities of this case. The other parties have informed the Court that they have no objection. Under all thes
More

ORDER

B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.

The Court has before it a motion to continue trial filed by defendant Noe Gonzalez. The defendant requests additional time so that counsel will have adequate time to prepare for trial. Defense counsel requests a continuance until October of 2013, and the Court finds that a continuance until October 21, 2013, would be reasonable given the complexities of this case. The other parties have informed the Court that they have no objection.

Under all these circumstances, the Court finds that a continuance is needed to give defense counsel an opportunity to provide an effective defense. Thus, a continuance is warranted under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) which authorizes a finding of excludable time when the refusal to grant a continuance would "deny counsel for the defendant ... the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation...." Under these circumstances, the interests of justice in allowing the defense time for effective preparation outweighs the Defendant's and the public's interest in a speedy trial under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).

This new trial date applies to all defendants. Under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), excludable time exists for "a reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for trial with a co-defendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted."

The Court finds that the period of time between the date the motion to continue was filed and the new trial date is excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act. Accordingly,

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for continuance (docket no. 33) filed by defendant be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED, and that the present trial date be VACATED, and that a new trial be set for October 21, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in the Federal Courthouse in Pocatello, Idaho.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the new trial date apply to all defendants pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the period of time between the date the motion to continue was filed and the new trial date be deemed EXCLUDABLE TIME under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the pretrial conference shall be held on October 9, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. by telephone with the Government to initiate the call. The Court can be reached at 208-334-9145. The defendants need not be on the line as only logistics will be discussed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the defendants shall file all pretrial motions on or before August 23, 2013.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer