Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HAYWOOD v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., JFM-14-1671. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Maryland Number: infdco20160201g91 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2015
Summary: J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Dear Counsel: I have reviewed the memoranda submitted in connection with plaintiff's motion to amend judgment or for reconsideration (document 52). Plaintiff's motion will be granted. I agree with defendant that 9 U.S.C. 3 seems to suggest that a stay, rather than a dismissal, of the action is appropriate. However, because of the importance of the issue and because plaintiff's would be subjected to unnecessary expense in pursuing arbitration in the ev
More

Dear Counsel:

I have reviewed the memoranda submitted in connection with plaintiff's motion to amend judgment or for reconsideration (document 52).

Plaintiff's motion will be granted. I agree with defendant that 9 U.S.C. § 3 seems to suggest that a stay, rather than a dismissal, of the action is appropriate. However, because of the importance of the issue and because plaintiff's would be subjected to unnecessary expense in pursuing arbitration in the event that the Fourth Circuit agrees with plaintiff's position that I should not have granted defendant's motion to compel arbitration, I have concluded that the best course to follow is for the case to be placed in a posture that the Fourth Circuit can rule upon the issue.

Despite the informal nature of this letter, it should be flagged as an opinion and docketed as an order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer