Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JURKOWICH v. TUCKER, 3:10cv189/MCR/CJK. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120511827 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 10, 2012
Latest Update: May 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 9, 2012. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation a
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 9, 2012. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for petitioner's failure to comply with an order of the Court and failure to keep the Court informed of his current address.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer