FRY v. ELITECH GROUP, INC., 2:14-cv-507-FtM-38DNF. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150204d82
Visitors: 42
Filed: Feb. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. On November 26, 2014, the Court administratively closed the above-captioned case for sixty days to allow the parties to submit final documents. ( Doc. #10 ). That time has now expired, and no stipulated form of final order or judgment has been submitted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice and close the file. DONE and ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Disclaimer: Documents filed
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. On November 26, 2014, the Court administratively closed the above-captioned case for sixty days to allow the parties to submit final documents. ( Doc. #10 ). That time has now expired, and no stipulated form of final order or judgment has been submitted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice and close the file. DONE and ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Disclaimer: Documents filed ..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
On November 26, 2014, the Court administratively closed the above-captioned case for sixty days to allow the parties to submit final documents. (Doc. #10). That time has now expired, and no stipulated form of final order or judgment has been submitted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
