LITZY v. COLVIN, 3:13cv00429. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140807879
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. This social security case is presently before the Court upon the parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #8), and the record as a whole. The parties request the case be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The parties stipulate that, on remand, the administrative law judge will "more fully evaluate the opinions of Dr. Wee and specify the rationale for the weight given to this opinion evidence.
Summary: ORDER THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. This social security case is presently before the Court upon the parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #8), and the record as a whole. The parties request the case be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The parties stipulate that, on remand, the administrative law judge will "more fully evaluate the opinions of Dr. Wee and specify the rationale for the weight given to this opinion evidence."..
More
ORDER
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This social security case is presently before the Court upon the parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #8), and the record as a whole. The parties request the case be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties stipulate that, on remand, the administrative law judge will "more fully evaluate the opinions of Dr. Wee and specify the rationale for the weight given to this opinion evidence." (Doc. #8, PageID# 503).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #8) is ACCEPTED;
2. The ALJ's decision is REVERSED;
3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Order and the parties' agreement; and,
4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
Source: Leagle
