Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Itriago, 13-20050-CR-ZLOCH. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20190318990 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH , Senior District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Report And Recommendation (DE 15) filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the entire record herein and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. By Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Indictment (DE 10), Defendant Jesus Alfredo Itriago (hereinafter "Defendant") moves the Court to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that said indictme
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Report And Recommendation (DE 15) filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the entire record herein and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

By Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Indictment (DE 10), Defendant Jesus Alfredo Itriago (hereinafter "Defendant") moves the Court to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that said indictment is defective for various reasons, and on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant has not yet submitted himself to the Court's jurisdiction. Defendant is a fugitive in Venezuela. Thus, Magistrate Judge Hunt recommends in his Report And Recommendation (DE 15) that the Court apply the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to deny the instant Motion (DE 15) without prejudice. In United States v. Shalhoub, the Eleventh Circuit held that it had no interlocutory jurisdiction to consider a defendant's appeal of the district court's denial of a motion for special appearance to seek dismissal of an indictment when a defendant was a fugitive. 855 F.3d 1255, 1262 (11th Cir. 2017). In that case, the court also concluded that defendant was not entitled to a writ of mandamus because even though he was residing outside of the United States and argued that he was not obligated to return, "That he does not want to submit himself to the jurisdiction of the federal courts does not make the legal remedies available to challenge his indictment inadequate." Id. at 1263. Here, Defendant may seek the remedy of dismissal of the indictment if he appears before the Court. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hunt's reasoning and conclusions.

Accordingly, after due consideration, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Defendant's Objection To Recommendation And Report (DE 16) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;

2. The Report And Recommendation (DE 15) filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt be and the same is hereby approved, adopted, and ratified by the Court; and

3. Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Indictment (DE 10) be and the same is hereby DENIED without prejudice and with leave to refile once Defendant is properly within the jurisdiction of the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer