Kissinger v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:17-cv-192. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171227744
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2017
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (Doc. #8). The parties agree that this matter should be remanded for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's de
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (Doc. #8). The parties agree that this matter should be remanded for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's dec..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. #8). The parties agree that this matter should be remanded for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's decision. The Commissioner will conduct further proceedings, offer the plaintiff a supplemental hearing and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, and then issue a new decision. As part of said proceedings, the opinion evidence of record will be reweighed.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The parties' Joint Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. #8) is ACCEPTED;
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58;
3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; and
4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
