Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SHINABARGER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-cv-11744. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20141003c05 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S [15] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS [8, 13] FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge. This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Whalen's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15), issued May 30, 2014. Magistrate Judge Whalen recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) and grant defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13). The parties were required to file specific
More

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S [15] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS [8, 13] FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.

This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Whalen's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15), issued May 30, 2014. Magistrate Judge Whalen recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) and grant defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13). The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service of the Report and Recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. Accordingly, upon review of the Report and Recommendation,

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) is DENIED;

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED; and

This case is dismissed.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer