F.R. v. STATE, 122 So.3d 866 (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number: inflco20130919150
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in F.R. v. State, 81 So.3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., concurs in result.
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in F.R. v. State, 81 So.3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
CANADY, J., concurs in result.
Source: Leagle
