ORDER

WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.

On November 20, 2017, the Eleventh Circuit C ou of Appeals affirmed this Court's award of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Doc. 81.) In addition, the Eleventh Circuit awarded Plaintiff its "costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred to defend this appeal" because Defendants "should have been well aware that their appeal had no chance of success." (id. at 13.) Finally, the Eleventh Circuit ordered that Defendants' counsel be held jointly and severally liable for the costs and attorneys' fees. (Id. at 13.)

On January 11, 2018, this Court directed Plaintiff to file within 21 days a brief as to the appropriate award of costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. (Doc. 84.) That order stated that "Defendants SHALL have fourteen days to respond." (Id. at 2.) On February 1, 2018, Plaintiff timely filed its brief. Neither Defendants nor their counsel filed any response. See S.D. Ga. L.R. 7.5 ("Failure to respond within the applicable time period shall indicate that there is no opposition to a motion.").

Regardless of the failure to file any response, the Court must still determine whether a requested fee is reasonable by using the lodestar approach, which values a lawyer's service based on the number of hours expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). In addressing the reasonableness of the hours expended, the Court should exclude any excessive, redundant, or unnecessary hours, along with hours that are inadequately documented or for which it would be unreasonable for an attorney to charge. Also, the Court will consider the twelve factors1 outlined in Johnson v. Ga. Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir. 1974),2 when calculating the lodestar. See Norman v. Housing Auth. of Montgomery, 836 F.2d 1292, 1299 (11th Cir. 1988). In support of its request, Plaintiff has submitted billing records evidencing the hours spent addressing Defendants' frivolous appeal and briefing the issue of an appropriate award, along with the applicable rates for the attorneys performing that work. (Doc. 85, Ex. 1.)

Based on the Court's experience with hourly rates billed in this market, the Court finds that the rates of $310.00 per hour for work performed by Kathleen Horne, $255.00 per hour for work performed by Margaret Puccini, $190.00 per hour for work performed by Andrew Dekle, and $165.00 per hour for work performed by Ashley Henson all to be appropriate based on the difficulty of the legal issues, required skill, and experience of counsel. Also, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's billing records and concludes that the 56.70 hours billed with respect to the appeal, and 19.10 hours billed with respect to the brief concerning the appropriate award of costs and fees do not include any excessive, redundant, unnecessary, improperly documented, or unreasonable hours. In addition, the Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to recover $105.36 in costs. As a result, the total award to Plaintiff is $17,445.36. As directed by the Eleventh Circuit, Defendant G. Glen Martin, Defendant Arthur G. Scanlan, defense counsel Amit Michael Navare, and defense counsel Eric J. Nathan are jointly and severally liable for the $17,445.36 award of costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

SO ORDERED.