Kiker v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation, 2:14-cv-2164. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160517c28
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER TERENCE P. KEMP , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file documents under seal. The motion provides no explanation for why the documents, or any portions of them, should be sealed. Without such an explanation, the Court is simply unable to determine if good cause exists to keep the documents out of the public record. The motion to file under seal (Doc. 111) is therefore denied.
ORDER
TERENCE P. KEMP, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file documents under seal. The motion provides no explanation for why the documents, or any portions of them, should be sealed. Without such an explanation, the Court is simply unable to determine if good cause exists to keep the documents out of the public record. The motion to file under seal (Doc. 111) is therefore denied.
Source: Leagle
