Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Grande v. Starbucks Corporation, 18-04036. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190403h33 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW , this 1st day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the Complaint (Doc. No. 1), the Motion to Dismiss of 1528 Walnut Limited Partnership (Doc. No. 16), the Motion to Dismiss of Two Six Two S. 18th Associates L.P. (Doc. No. 17), the Motion to Dismiss of Starbucks Corporation (Doc. No. 23), James Grande's Responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 22, 24, and 26), and the Reply of Starbucks Corporation (Doc. No. 25), it is ORDERED that the Motions to D
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the Complaint (Doc. No. 1), the Motion to Dismiss of 1528 Walnut Limited Partnership (Doc. No. 16), the Motion to Dismiss of Two Six Two S. 18th Associates L.P. (Doc. No. 17), the Motion to Dismiss of Starbucks Corporation (Doc. No. 23), James Grande's Responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 22, 24, and 26), and the Reply of Starbucks Corporation (Doc. No. 25), it is ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 16, 17, and 23) are GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Mr. Grande may file an amended complaint on or before May 1, 2019 if he believes he can cure the problems described in the accompanying Memorandum. The defendants shall have 21 days to respond to any amended pleading. If Mr. Grande does not file an amended complaint on or before May 1, 2019, this case may be closed without further notice to Mr. Grande.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer