SMITH v. WETZEL, 13-2410. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150818b16
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER LINDA K. CARACAPPA , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the petitioner's Motion for Discovery and Consolidated Memorandum of Law (Document No. 26), the government's Response to Motion for Response (Document No. 29), petitioner's Motion for Leave to Reply (Document No. 30), the government's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Reply (Document No. 31), and petitioner's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Document No. 37), it is hereby
Summary: ORDER LINDA K. CARACAPPA , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the petitioner's Motion for Discovery and Consolidated Memorandum of Law (Document No. 26), the government's Response to Motion for Response (Document No. 29), petitioner's Motion for Leave to Reply (Document No. 30), the government's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Reply (Document No. 31), and petitioner's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Document No. 37), it is hereby ..
More
ORDER
LINDA K. CARACAPPA, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the petitioner's Motion for Discovery and Consolidated Memorandum of Law (Document No. 26), the government's Response to Motion for Response (Document No. 29), petitioner's Motion for Leave to Reply (Document No. 30), the government's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Reply (Document No. 31), and petitioner's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Document No. 37), it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's motion for discovery is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
