U.S. v. HERNANDEZ-VALENCIA, 1:14-CR-341. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150515c52
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 14, 2015
Latest Update: May 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Justin Anand's Final Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [Doc. 28-1] is currently before the Court. The R&R recommends the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 13]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any portion of the R&R that is the subject of a proper objection on a de novo basis and any non-objected portion on a "clearly erroneous" standard. The Defendant filed no objections to the report here
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Justin Anand's Final Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [Doc. 28-1] is currently before the Court. The R&R recommends the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 13]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any portion of the R&R that is the subject of a proper objection on a de novo basis and any non-objected portion on a "clearly erroneous" standard. The Defendant filed no objections to the report here...
More
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Justin Anand's Final Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [Doc. 28-1] is currently before the Court. The R&R recommends the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 13].
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any portion of the R&R that is the subject of a proper objection on a de novo basis and any non-objected portion on a "clearly erroneous" standard. The Defendant filed no objections to the report here. The Court has reviewed the R&R and record in this matter and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R [Doc. 28-1] and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 13].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
