U.S. v. FERGUSON, CR 112-255. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20130620b65
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no obj ections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the motion to suppress filed by Defendant Ferguson is DENIED. (Doc. no. 34.) SO ORDERED.
ORDER
RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no obj ections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the motion to suppress filed by Defendant Ferguson is DENIED. (Doc. no. 34.)
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
