NITTANY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, LLC v. COLLEGE TOWNSHIP, 4:12-cv-00672. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140521e80
Visitors: 22
Filed: May 20, 2014
Latest Update: May 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum filed this same date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs's motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 25 & 28) are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. The permit requirement (Coll. Twp Code 170-4) and variance procedure (Coll. Twp. Code 170-27) set forth in the Sign Ordinance of College Township are each UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the First Amendment of the United State
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum filed this same date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs's motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 25 & 28) are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. The permit requirement (Coll. Twp Code 170-4) and variance procedure (Coll. Twp. Code 170-27) set forth in the Sign Ordinance of College Township are each UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the First Amendment of the United States..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
In accordance with the Memorandum filed this same date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Plaintiffs's motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 25 & 28) are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
2. The permit requirement (Coll. Twp Code § 170-4) and variance procedure (Coll. Twp. Code § 170-27) set forth in the Sign Ordinance of College Township are each UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
3. College Township and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are ENJOINED from enforcing against plaintiffs the Sign Ordinance's permit requirement and all Ordinance clauses to the extent they implement the permit requirement.
4. College Township and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are ENJOINED from enforcing against plaintiffs the Sign Ordinance's variance procedures and all Ordinance clauses to the extent they implement the variance procedures.
Source: Leagle
