Riffle v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-00419. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180205646
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to local practice, this social security case has been referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for initial review and a report and recommendation. On December 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for remand to the Commissioner of Social Security (doc. 11). Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED THAT: The parties' Stipulation to Remand (Doc. 11) should be GRANTED, with the Commissioner's decision to be reversed
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to local practice, this social security case has been referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for initial review and a report and recommendation. On December 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for remand to the Commissioner of Social Security (doc. 11). Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED THAT: The parties' Stipulation to Remand (Doc. 11) should be GRANTED, with the Commissioner's decision to be reversed a..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to local practice, this social security case has been referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for initial review and a report and recommendation. On December 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for remand to the Commissioner of Social Security (doc. 11).
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED THAT:
The parties' Stipulation to Remand (Doc. 11) should be GRANTED, with the Commissioner's decision to be reversed and remanded for further consideration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in accordance with the parties' stipulation.
NOTICE
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to this Report & Recommendation ("R&R") within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the filing date of this R&R. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party shall respond to an opponent's objections within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Source: Leagle
