Filed: Jul. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge recommending that Defendants' motion to modify the CMSO (Dkt. 111) be granted, and the parties' proposed amended CMSO, with the exception of Paragraph 6, be adopted. (Dkt. 123). The parties do not oppose. (Dkts. 125, 126). A district court may accept, reject or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). In the absence of specific obje
Summary: ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge recommending that Defendants' motion to modify the CMSO (Dkt. 111) be granted, and the parties' proposed amended CMSO, with the exception of Paragraph 6, be adopted. (Dkt. 123). The parties do not oppose. (Dkts. 125, 126). A district court may accept, reject or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). In the absence of specific objec..
More
ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge recommending that Defendants' motion to modify the CMSO (Dkt. 111) be granted, and the parties' proposed amended CMSO, with the exception of Paragraph 6, be adopted. (Dkt. 123). The parties do not oppose. (Dkts. 125, 126).
A district court may accept, reject or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that factual findings be reviewed de novo, and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. § 636(b)(1)(C); Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App'x. 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citing United States v. Warren, 687 F.2d 347, 348 (11th Cir. 1982)); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law,
1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 123) is APPROVED and ADOPTED for all purposes, including for appellate review.
2. The Case Management and Scheduling Order (Dkt. 88) is amended as follows:1
Non-Expert/Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline May 17, 2019
Discovery Cutoff July 19, 2019
Dispositive and Daubert Motion Deadline August 16, 2019
Pretrial Conference October 3, 2019 at 10:00 A.M.
Trial Term November 4, 2019
