Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MOORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:10-cv-916. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20120221a06 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on January 27, 2012 (Doc. 9). Proper notice has been given to the parties under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report in a timely manner. (Doc. 9, 27); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 , 949-50 (6th
More

ORDER

MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on January 27, 2012 (Doc. 9). Proper notice has been given to the parties under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report in a timely manner. (Doc. 9, 27); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). No objection has been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

Having reviewed this matter de novo, this Court finds the Report to be correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report is hereby ADOPTED in full. As the Report recommends (Doc. 9, 26), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer