Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. McCUISTON, 1:15-cr-00247-BLW. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Idaho Number: infdco20160615d78 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . The Court has before it Defendant McCuiston's Motion to Continue Trial (Dkt. 29). Defendant states that counsel needs additional time to do investigation, review discovery, and prepare for trial. Defendant requests an additional 60 days. Under all these circumstances, the Court finds that a continuance is needed to give defense counsel an opportunity to provide an effective defense. Thus, a conti
More

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE

The Court has before it Defendant McCuiston's Motion to Continue Trial (Dkt. 29). Defendant states that counsel needs additional time to do investigation, review discovery, and prepare for trial. Defendant requests an additional 60 days.

Under all these circumstances, the Court finds that a continuance is needed to give defense counsel an opportunity to provide an effective defense. Thus, a continuance is warranted under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), which authorizes a finding of excludable time when the refusal to grant a continuance would "deny counsel for the defendant . . . the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation . . . ." Under these circumstances, the interests of justice in allowing the defense time for effective preparation outweighs the defendant's and the public's interest in a speedy trial under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The statements of defense counsel establish that the trial should be reset on August 8, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. at the United States Courthouse in Pocatello, Idaho. The Court finds that the period of time between the present trial date and the new trial date is excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act.

Co-defendants have not moved for a continuance. However, they have not opposed the motion. Under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), excludable time exists for "a reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for trial with a co-defendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted." No motion for severance has been filed. Accordingly, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), the Court finds that the excludable time found for the defendant moving for a continuance also applies to the co-defendants. Thus, the co-defendants will have trial moved to June 20, 2016 as well. Accordingly,

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial (Dkt. 29) shall be, and the same is hereby GRANTED, and that the present trial date be VACATED, and that a new trial be set for August 8, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in the U.S. Courthouse in Pocatello, Idaho.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time between the prior trial date and the new trial date be deemed EXCLUDABLE TIME under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6) and (7)(A) & (B).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the current trial readiness conference be VACATED, and that a new trial readiness conference be conducted by telephone on July 28, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. The Government shall place the call to (208) 334-9145 with opposing counsel on the line.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed on or before July 11, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer