U.S. v. NEVAREZ-AYON, 4:12-cr-00020-BLW. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20130807949
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge. The Court has before it Defendant's Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel (Dkt. 471), and Defendant's Motion for Preparation of Transcripts at Government Expense (Dkt. 473). Because Defendant Nevarez-Ayon has retained new counsel per the stipulation, the Court requires more explanation of how he can retain private counsel, but needs the Government to pay for preparation of transcripts. Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge. The Court has before it Defendant's Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel (Dkt. 471), and Defendant's Motion for Preparation of Transcripts at Government Expense (Dkt. 473). Because Defendant Nevarez-Ayon has retained new counsel per the stipulation, the Court requires more explanation of how he can retain private counsel, but needs the Government to pay for preparation of transcripts. Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice...
More
ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendant's Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel (Dkt. 471), and Defendant's Motion for Preparation of Transcripts at Government Expense (Dkt. 473).
Because Defendant Nevarez-Ayon has retained new counsel per the stipulation, the Court requires more explanation of how he can retain private counsel, but needs the Government to pay for preparation of transcripts. Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel (Dkt. 471) is GRANTED.
2. Defendant's Motion for Preparation of Transcripts at Government Expense (Dkt. 473)is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may renew his motion, but shall include an explanation and affidavits where necessary explaining why he is unable to pay for his transcripts but able to retain private counsel. Defendant may submit his motion ex parte.
Source: Leagle
