Filed: Feb. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2012
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL J.L, FILED FEBRUARY 8, 2012 1 FOLEY Presidin FUJIS and GINOZA, JJ. Upon consideration of Defendants-Appellants' Motion for Reconsideration of February 8, 2012 Order Granting Plaintiff-Appellee Eastern Savings Bank, FSB's Motion To Dismiss Appeal filed February 21, 2012, the memorandum/papers in suppo
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL J.L, FILED FEBRUARY 8, 2012 1 FOLEY Presidin FUJIS and GINOZA, JJ. Upon consideration of Defendants-Appellants' Motion for Reconsideration of February 8, 2012 Order Granting Plaintiff-Appellee Eastern Savings Bank, FSB's Motion To Dismiss Appeal filed February 21, 2012, the memorandum/papers in suppor..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL J.L, FILED FEBRUARY 8, 20121
FOLEY Presidin FUJIS and GINOZA, JJ.
Upon consideration of Defendants-Appellants' Motion for Reconsideration of February 8, 2012 Order Granting Plaintiff-Appellee Eastern Savings Bank, FSB's Motion To Dismiss Appeal filed February 21, 2012, the memorandum/papers in support of the motion, and the records and files in this case, it appears that:
(1) Appellee Eastern Savings Bank, FSB's Motion to Dismiss Appeal (motion to dismiss) was filed on January 30, 2012 and, on that same date, Defendants-Appellants were served with the motion to dismiss by hand delivery.
(2) Any objection by Defendants-Appellants to the motion to dismiss was due on February 6, 2012. Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP), Rules 26 and 27.
(3) Defendants-Appellants did not file any timely objection to the motion to dismiss, nor did they seek an extension for responding to the motion as allowed under HRAP Rules 2 6 and 27.
(4) The order granting the motion to dismiss was filed on February 8, 2012, after any objection from Defendants-Appellants was due.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.
