Filed: Feb. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 60). No party objected, and the time to do so passed. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 , 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Without a specific objection, the judge need not rev
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 60). No party objected, and the time to do so passed. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 , 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Without a specific objection, the judge need not revi..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 60). No party objected, and the time to do so passed.
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Without a specific objection, the judge need not review factual findings de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). But the district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even without an objection. Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).
After a careful, complete, and independent examination of the file, the Court accepts and adopts Judge McCoy's R&R in full.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 60) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate and/or Modify the Appraisal Award (Doc. 58) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink's availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order.
