Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BURTON v. MULL, 1:11-CV-179 (WLS). (2013)

Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia Number: infdco20130613903 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2013
Summary: ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS,, District Judge. Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed May 23, 2013. (Doc. 46.) It is recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 36) be granted. (Doc. 46 at 4-6.) No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on June 6, 2013. ( See Doc. 46 at 6; Docket). Upon full review and consideration upon th
More

ORDER

W. LOUIS SANDS,, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed May 23, 2013. (Doc. 46.) It is recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 36) be granted. (Doc. 46 at 4-6.) No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on June 6, 2013. (See Doc. 46 at 6; Docket).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 46) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 36) is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall taking nothing by his Complaint (Doc. 1) and JUDGMENT shall be entered in favor of Defendant.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer