Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CARDONA-CASTILLO, 2:13-cr-129-FtM-38CM. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140925a73 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. On September 23, 2013, the Court heard arguments from the Parties regarding why it should entertain Defendant's Motion to Suppress ( Doc. #73 ). As a result of developments prior to the hearing, the Motion to Suppress hearing was continued to a later date. However, based upon the Court's research, it appears that there is controlling Eleventh Circuit precedent addressing the issues raised by the Motion which neither party brought to the Court's at
More

ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

On September 23, 2013, the Court heard arguments from the Parties regarding why it should entertain Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. #73). As a result of developments prior to the hearing, the Motion to Suppress hearing was continued to a later date. However, based upon the Court's research, it appears that there is controlling Eleventh Circuit precedent addressing the issues raised by the Motion which neither party brought to the Court's attention. Therefore, the Court requires supplemental briefs from both Parties in light of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Case U.S. v. Farias-Gonzalez, 556 F.3d 1181 (2009), within seven days of this Order.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Parties are required to file supplemental briefs in light of the Eleventh Circuit case U.S. v. Farias-Gonzalez, 556 F.3d 1181 (2009), within SEVEN DAYS of this Order.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer