Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Collier v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company, 2:19-cv-49-FtM-38MRM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190221c30 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Wright National Flood Insurance Company's ("Wright") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Florida Law Claims and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed on February 4, 2019. (Doc. 7). Wright filed its Answer and Defenses that same day. (Doc. 8). A motion to dismiss is improper once a responsive pleading has been filed. See Skritch v. Thornton, 280 F.3d 1295 , 1306 (11th Cir. 2002). Thus, "[a]n Answer filed contempor
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Defendant Wright National Flood Insurance Company's ("Wright") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Florida Law Claims and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed on February 4, 2019. (Doc. 7). Wright filed its Answer and Defenses that same day. (Doc. 8).

A motion to dismiss is improper once a responsive pleading has been filed. See Skritch v. Thornton, 280 F.3d 1295, 1306 (11th Cir. 2002). Thus, "[a]n Answer filed contemporaneously with the filing of a Motion to Dismiss renders the motion moot and makes it procedurally impossible for the Court to rule on the motion to dismiss." Smith v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 2:11-CV-676-FTM-29, 2014 WL 897032, at *9 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 6, 2014) (citing Brisk v. City of Miami Beach, Fla., 709 F.Supp. 1146, 1147 (S.D. Fla. 1989) (internal quotation marks omitted)). Here, Wright filed its answer and affirmative defenses contemporaneously with its motion to dismiss. (Doc. 8). Therefore, the motion to dismiss will be denied as moot.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Defendant Wright National Flood Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Florida Law Claims and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer