U.S. v. WIMS, 1:04cr6-MP-GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120112c39
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Doc. 898, Defendant's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability regarding the order at Doc. 894, and Doc. 911, Defendant's Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. For the reasons stated in the order at Doc. 894, the Court finds that Petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Theref
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Doc. 898, Defendant's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability regarding the order at Doc. 894, and Doc. 911, Defendant's Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. For the reasons stated in the order at Doc. 894, the Court finds that Petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Therefo..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Doc. 898, Defendant's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability regarding the order at Doc. 894, and Doc. 911, Defendant's Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. For the reasons stated in the order at Doc. 894, the Court finds that Petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Therefore, no certificate of appealability is appropriate in this case. Also, under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4), the Court may certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith and for that reason deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set out in the order at doc. 894, the Court hereby certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The Motion for Certificate of Appealability, Doc. 898, is DENIED, and the Motion to Appeal in Forma Pauperis, Doc. 911, is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
